Home / Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.2

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.2

Two flagship mid-tier models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Here's how they stack up on price, quality, and capabilities.

Quick Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a larger context window (1M vs 400K) and slightly lower input pricing, making it ideal for document-heavy workflows. GPT-5.2 edges ahead on output cost efficiency and matches on benchmark quality. For most use cases, both are excellent — your choice may come down to ecosystem preference or context needs.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
GPT-5.2
OpenAI
Input Price $3.00/1M $1.75/1M
Output Price $15.00/1M $14.00/1M
Blended Price $9.00/1M $7.88/1M
LMSYS Elo 1385 1390
Context Window 1,000,000 400,000
Reasoning Strong Strong
Code Generation Excellent Excellent
Provider Anthropic OpenAI

Monthly cost estimate

Adjust the sliders to see how costs compare for your workload.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
per month
GPT-5.2
per month

Pricing breakdown

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is priced at $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens, giving a blended rate of $9.00/1M. GPT-5.2 comes in lower on input at $1.75/1M but charges $14.00/1M for output, yielding a blended cost of $7.88/1M. For input-heavy workloads (RAG, document processing), GPT-5.2 offers meaningful savings. For output-heavy tasks like long-form generation, the gap narrows considerably.

Quality & benchmarks

On the LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboard, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 1385 Elo while GPT-5.2 reaches 1390 — a difference well within the margin of statistical noise. Both models excel at reasoning, instruction following, and code generation. Claude Sonnet is particularly noted for careful, nuanced writing, while GPT-5.2 has a slight edge in structured data tasks and function calling.

Context window comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports a 1,000,000-token context window — 2.5x larger than GPT-5.2's 400,000-token limit. This makes Claude the clear choice for workflows involving large codebases, legal documents, or multi-document analysis where the full context must be available in a single call. GPT-5.2's 400K window is still generous for most applications.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need...

1M token context for large documents
Nuanced, careful writing and analysis
Agentic coding and tool use

Choose GPT-5.2 if you need...

Lower input cost for high-volume calls
Tight OpenAI ecosystem integration
Broad developer tooling support

Other popular comparisons