AI Token Price
AnthropicOpenAI

Pricing compared · checked 2–11 Nov 2026

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 / $20.00 and GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 / $50.00 per million input / output tokens. At a typical 3:1 mix, Claude Opus 5.5 is 2.5× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra. On Epoch AI’s Capabilities Index they score level (169 vs 169, within each other’s margin of error).

Price
Claude Opus 5.5 is 2.5× cheaper per token
On a coding agent: $853 vs $2,598 a month (3× less)
Capability
Level
Claude Opus 5.5 169 (166–172)
GPT-6 Astra 169 (166–173)
Best value at Claude Opus 5.5’s level
GPT-6.1 Terra, 4× less
Level with or above Claude Opus 5.5 · $213 a month on a coding agent · Every option
Input
$4.00
per 1M
Output
$20.00
per 1M
Cached
$0.20
1M context
Input
$10.00
per 1M
Output
$50.00
per 1M
Cached
$1.00
1.05M context

Side by side

✓ marks the cheaper price, larger context window, bigger discount or higher score.

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra: prices and limits
DetailClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra
Price per 1M tokens
Input$4.00Lowest$10.00
Output$20.00Lowest$50.00
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$8.00Lowest$20.00
Cached input$0.20Lowest$1.00
Batch or off-peak discount50% (batch)50% (batch)
Long promptsSame rate at any lengthOver 272K: 2× in, 1.5× out
Limits and model
Context window1M1.05MLargest
Capability score Epoch AI index169169
Arena text score 25 Sep 20261509Highest1478
Released22 Sep 20263 Sep 2026
Open weightsNoNo
StatusCurrentCurrent
Checked
Price checked11 Nov 2026
Anthropic pricing
2 Nov 2026
OpenAI pricing

Monthly cost on three workloads

List prices, no batch discount. The cached share applies where a model has a cache rate.

WorkloadClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 AstraDifference
Customer chat assistant50,000 conversations a month, about 2,000 tokens in and 400 out each; 50% cachedPrice this workload in the calculator $610Lower$1,550$940
Document Q&A (RAG)20,000 questions a month over retrieved documents, 12,000 in and 600 out; 30% cachedPrice this workload in the calculator $926Lower$2,352$1,426
Coding agent400 tasks a month, 40 steps each with a growing context; 85% cachedPrice this workload in the calculator $738Lower$2,163$1,425

How they differ

  • Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper on input ($4 vs $10).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper on output ($20 vs $50), which matters most for long answers and reasoning models.
  • GPT-6 Astra accepts longer prompts (1.05M vs 1M tokens).
  • Cached input is cheaper on Claude Opus 5.5 ($0.20 vs $1), which favours agents and chat apps that resend the same context.
  • Both score 169 on Epoch AI’s Capabilities Index, so on general benchmarks they’re level. Claude Opus 5.5 is 2.5× cheaper for a similar score.
  • On the Arena text leaderboard (25 Sep 2026), Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher (1509 vs 1478). Test both on your own prompts before deciding.

Add a third model to this comparison

Recent changes

All changes
  • OpenAI
    OpenAI launched GPT-6.1 Terra at $1 / $5 per 1M tokens, with cached input at $0.05: half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • OpenAI
    GPT-6.1 Sol replaced GPT-6 Sol at the same $2 / $10 per 1M tokens, with cached input cut from $0.20 to $0.10.
  • Anthropic
    ▼ 20%Claude Opus 5.5 launched at $4 / $20 per 1M tokens, 20% below Opus 5. $5 / $25 → $4 / $20
  • OpenAI
    OpenAI launched GPT-6 Sol at $2 / $10 and GPT-6 Luna at $0.10 / $0.50.
  • OpenAI
    OpenAI launched GPT-6 Astra at $10 / $50, its most expensive standard model.

Related comparisons

Compare up to four