GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 / $5.00 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 / $10.00 per million input / output tokens. At a typical 3:1 mix, GPT-6.1 Terra is 2.0× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Input
$1.00
per 1M
Output
$5.00
per 1M
Cached
$0.050
1.05M context
Input
$2.00
per 1M
Output
$10.00
per 1M
Cached
$0.10
1M context
Side by side
✓ marks the cheaper price, larger context window, bigger discount or higher score.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00Lowest | $2.00 |
| Output | $5.00Lowest | $10.00 |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $2.00Lowest | $4.00 |
| Cached input | $0.050Lowest | $0.10 |
| Batch or off-peak discount | 50% (batch) | 50% (batch) |
| Long prompts | Over 272K: 2× in, 1.5× out | Same rate at any length |
| Limits and model | ||
| Context window | 1.05MLargest | 1M |
| Capability score Epoch AI index | 168 | 167 |
| Released | 26 Oct 2026 | 28 Sep 2026 |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Checked | ||
| Price checked | 2 Nov 2026 OpenAI pricing | 22 Oct 2026 Anthropic pricing |
Monthly cost on three workloads
List prices, no batch discount. The cached share applies where a model has a cache rate.
| Workload | GPT-6.1 Terra | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer chat assistant50,000 conversations a month, about 2,000 tokens in and 400 out each; 50% cachedPrice this workload in the calculator | $153Lower | $305 | $153 |
| Document Q&A (RAG)20,000 questions a month over retrieved documents, 12,000 in and 600 out; 30% cachedPrice this workload in the calculator | $232Lower | $463 | $232 |
| Coding agent400 tasks a month, 40 steps each with a growing context; 85% cachedPrice this workload in the calculator | $184Lower | $369 | $184 |
How they differ
- GPT-6.1 Terra is cheaper on input ($1 vs $2).
- GPT-6.1 Terra is cheaper on output ($5 vs $10), which matters most for long answers and reasoning models.
- GPT-6.1 Terra accepts longer prompts (1.05M vs 1M tokens).
- Cached input is cheaper on GPT-6.1 Terra ($0.05 vs $0.10), which favours agents and chat apps that resend the same context.
- On Epoch AI’s Capabilities Index, GPT-6.1 Terra scores 168 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 167, within each other’s margin of error, so treat them as level on general benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Terra is 2.0× cheaper for a similar score.
Recent changes
All changes- OpenAI launched GPT-6.1 Terra at $1 / $5 per 1M tokens, with cached input at $0.05: half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol.
- Anthropic halved Claude Sonnet 5.5's cache-read price from $0.20 to $0.10 per 1M tokens; Anthropic says this cuts most agent workloads by about 20%.
- GPT-6.1 Sol replaced GPT-6 Sol at the same $2 / $10 per 1M tokens, with cached input cut from $0.20 to $0.10.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 replaced Sonnet 5 at the same $2 / $10 per 1M tokens, with cache reads at $0.20.
- OpenAI launched GPT-6 Sol at $2 / $10 and GPT-6 Luna at $0.10 / $0.50.
Related comparisons
Compare up to fourKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.00 / $10.00 · $2.00 / $10.00
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 3.8 Flash$1.00 / $5.00 · $0.75 / $3.75
Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.00 / $10.00 · $2.00 / $10.00
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol$2.00 / $10.00 · $2.00 / $10.00
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5$1.32 / $3.96 · $2.00 / $10.00
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash$2.00 / $10.00 · $0.75 / $3.75